|
United Nations Day – 2008
A 63 year old Shell Game
Three score and three years ago (24 Oct 1945), a
motley collection of communists, atheists,
Darwinians, social engineers and Utopians cobbled
together an international agency designed, we were
told, “to save succeeding generations from the
scourge of war.”
Or, so we were told.
The fact is, the United Nations was designed and
intended to be the introduction mode of the
establishment of a One World Government – the dream
of empire builders for centuries.
If you took government as a subject in high school or
college, you were taught that a government, by
definition, must have certain elements (with very
rare exceptions), such as:
- A land mass;
- A Charter, or Constitution;
- A Chief of State;
- A system of making laws, usually a Legislature;
- A system of jurisprudence, or a Court;
- A system of finance, or Banking;
- A system of taxation;
- A system of enforcement for taxes and decrees;
- A military and/or police force.
So, which of the above does the United Nations not
have? They claim the planet as their land
mass. They are in the process of developing a
system of taxation. They use the soldiers of
“member states” (which will become, in time, “vassal
states”) to enforce their edicts.
It will come as a surprise to some, perhaps, to know
that, since 1950, virtually every military action in
which Americans who have fought, bled, and died in
war, were conducted under one form or another of
United Nations control, the action in Granada being
an exception.
The dream of a one-world government was almost
realized during the great Marxist Revolution in the
United States – the administration of Woodrow Wilson,
in which fully half of the Communist Platform was not
just suggested, but placed in effect!1 The League of Nations
was set up, and did not completely cease to exist
until 1946, although it was largely non-functional by
1925. One reason for its failure was cited at
the time that a nation, once joined, could withdraw
if they chose. That mistake was not repeated
with the United Nations. No nation is allowed
to withdraw, once accepted.
“The UN formed a continuum with the League of
Nations in general purpose, structure, and functions;
many of the UN’s principal organs and related
agencies were adopted from similar structures
established earlier in the century.”2
It often comes as a surprise to Americans, even to
soldiers serving under NATO, that the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization is an organ of the United
Nations. Yet, one only needs to read their
preamble to verify that this is so. The current
Afghanistan military operation has been handed over
100% to NATO.
The current military action in Iraq was begun because
it claimed to be enforcing certain U.N. resolutions,
even though there was no Security Council vote to
authorize the action. So, what we have here is
the United States acting, unilaterally, to impose the
dictates of the United Nations, while the UN blusters
and denies that it is involved. Either the UN
is lying, or the Bush administration is lying, but
both sides agree that it was UN resolutions that
brought the current occupation of Iraq about.
When Americans travel abroad, they are often started
at the European perspective, which is that the United
Nations is a puppet of the United States, but one is
hard-pressed to argue otherwise.
So, while we delude ourselves that we are not “under
the U.N.”, it becomes a moot point, if we are running
the U.N., and if we are operating through the cover
of U.N. authority to achieve US Empire.
American soldiers may not be wearing blue berets
(thanks to Army SPC Michael New, who lost his case,
but won his war to keep American soldiers out of
direct United Nation’s control – www.MikeNew.com/), but
once again, the practical result has been the same –
Americans in Iraq are there under United Nations’
Security Counsel Resolutions, and won’t leave without
another U.N. arrangement, treaty, or occupation force
to take our place. Once the U.N. establishes a
military presence in a country, it is rare, indeed,
that they ever leave. Ask the Koreans about
that.
Here’s the dangerous part of the shell game.
While we all watch the military actions, the United
Nations assumes each country that it invades (for
their own protection) unto itself, and parcels off
its infrastructure to its cronies for political
payola3, and then
it continues to stay on, as Big Brother, to make sure
things don’t flare up again.
The problem is, if they have the authority to do it
in Africa, or Eastern Europe, then they have the
authority to do it in Texas, or Montana.
Geography is no defense. It’s only a matter of
time.
© 2008, Daniel D. New
Compare the Platform of Karl Marx with the
accomplishments of the Wilson regime, and no other
conclusion is possible. The “Progressive
Income Tax”, Inheritance taxes, etc., were nothing
less than a war on private property, and a triumph of
Marxism in America. The rest of the 20th
Century was a “mopping up operation.”
A
study of the Belgian Congo is a case in point,
where copper mining rights were given to the family
of Dag Hammarskjöld, after he was killed in a plane
crash. Command of the African Corps is
apparently going to fall to Kofi Annan, as he sets
up his KAIPTC. http://www.kaiptc.org/home/
|
