|
Knowledge is the fact or condition of
knowing something with
familiarity gained through experience or
association. Risk is the potential for loss.
These two related concepts are easy to understand when
facts support knowledge to assess risk. Managing risk is
a key role of management and boards. How can
corporate stakeholders, who include the board, owners,
lenders and investors, manage risk when they don’t know
the facts? How do they manage risk when they don’t
know what they don’t know?
Signs We Need
to Know More
After years of
working in corporate financial management and consulting
with companies in transition, I’ve developed a list of
seven signals indicating more knowledge is needed to
manage risk.
1.
The Weak Link
in the Management Team
As the first line of defense in managing
corporate risk, each member of the management team must
have the skills to recognize risk, assess it and resolve
the risk. If the individuals lack the required
skills for their responsibilities, then risks may go
unrecognized. Corporate stakeholders should know
the strong players from the weaker members of the
management team and how the company compensates for these
weaker team members.
2. Management
Organization isn't on the Organization
Chart
Corporate
culture is the manner in which things are done within a
company. Does management operate within silos or
cross functionally? Is management instructed to
keep the “bad” news away from the stakeholders? Early in
my career I was hired to “change the culture” in the
controller’s department of a large Company. Certainly
managers can influence a department’s culture but overall
culture is defined by top management.
The Board is ultimately responsible for a
company’s culture and influences the overall culture
through its corporate governance practices which include
statements of values, management selection and incentive
compensation design.
3. Controls for
Everyone
Top management must support internal financial
controls for all personnel including themselves. If
the financial controls are not respected, then the
corporate stakeholders can’t depend on controls to
surface risks. Corporate stakeholders support financial
controls through audit committees, internal and external
audits, and appropriate action when controls are
violated.
4. Tools for the
Job
Just
as you wouldn’t think of hiring a plumber without the
right tools, does the board support all business
processes to ensure good financial systems are in place
for management to do their job effectively?
The board and the CEO have the responsibility to direct
asset allocations. Failure to support all business
processes and functions will result in problems. A
company can’t run on sales and operations
only.
In one consulting project, I sensed
something was different about the company just in walking
around but I couldn’t define it at first. Finally,
I realized that I hadn’t seen so much paper in a company
in a long, long time. The failure to invest in
technology was a major clue that the company had risks
that weren’t well defined despite heavy investment in the
business.
5. Information or
Data
Does
the data create information or is the information merely
a data dump? Is it timely? Can management use the
information to answer why? This can be tougher for
a stakeholder to assess because reporting tends to follow
the way it has always been done. The key here is to
drill down into the data structure to insure it’s aligned
with the business units. Businesses change and the
reporting process must change with it. Poor data
compilation within the financial reporting leads to
inaccurate information and ultimately wrong
decisions.
In
one situation, management used the standard overhead
allocation model to develop pricing but failed to
recognize that the “new” business wouldn’t share that
overhead. Lack of critical thinking caused this
mistake primarily because the overhead calculation was
always done that way.
6. Managing for
Today and Tomorrow
How
well does the management team anticipate financial,
operational and market place changes? Are these changes
incorporated into planning and action?
Years ago a company recruited me to become their
CFO. In my discussion with the CEO, I sensed he was
experiencing a great deal of stress with the Board about
planning for the most current year. I sensed that
the CEO was more stressed that the current year losses
hadn’t been planned than actually losing money. He
confirmed this. If a company doesn’t know what’s
going on in their business, it isn’t in control.
Stakeholders must insist on adequate planning, monitoring
results and anticipation of change.
7. Management and
the Board
Managing
risks begin and end with management. You may
remember that Cantor Fitzgerald, a global financial
services firm, lost two-thirds of its workforce in the
9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. Within one
week, the company was able to bring its trading back
online. This is a great example of how management
prepared for a major risk and was able to emerge from it
despite the loss of its team. Although management
develops the plans, it is the Board who insists on the
plans being fully developed.
Managing
risk begins with knowledge of how to identify these seven
signals.
When
you need to sort out the facts to gain the knowledge to
manage risk in order to discover the roots of growth,
consider the senior level experience provided by Debra
Pauli and Corporate Financial Solutions, LLC. We're
experienced in evaluating the crucial issues to manage
risk.
Debra
Pauli, CPA/CFF, CTP,
CVA
404-625-1348
Lagniappe (noun) (lan-yap) a
small gift given a customer by a merchant at the
time of a purchase; broadly : something given or obtained
gratuitously or by way of good
measure
"Knowledge is of two kinds: we know a subject ourselves,
or
we know where we can find information upon
it."
Author Samual Johnson (1709-1784)
quoted in "Boswell's Life of Johnson"
|

|
|
Debra
Pauli CPA/CFF,CTP,CVA
|
|
About
CFS
Corporate
Financial Solutions provides confidential strategic
financial management consulting to resolve crucial issues
for businesses in transition.
Founder Debra Pauli
brings senior level experience, on site, to evaluate
issues crucial to minimizing risk. CFS has repeatedly
been able to protect assets, enhance value for the seller
or limit after purchase losses for a buyer by discretely
drilling down to the bottom of financial information
until the solid realities of business performance are
known.
CFS has supported private equity groups,
Audit Committees, entrepreneurs, investors and lenders
during risky business transitions. Typical
transitions include turnarounds, the sale of a business,
and management change. As a trusted adviser, you
can be assured that CFS will provide your client the
confidentiality and expertise that make the crucial
difference in a successful outcome.
“Due to Debra’s ability to quickly
understand the Company’s business, manage challenging
cash flows and provide the guidance and analysis
necessary to help move the Company forward, the Company
moved to a much stronger position both operationally and
financially.”
President & CEO of
a medical equipment
company
February 2012
|